Indeed, which is proper. Ethan Perlstein, an evolutionary pharmacologist, is interested in checking out the psychopharmacology driving amphetamines, which involves crystal meth. (And don’t get worried: Perlstein made the meth lab joke before me.) But instead than composing a grant proposal, Perlstein and his colleagues are interested in crowdfunding their analysis:
Funding this challenge would not be straightforward, and Perlstein has currently crunched the figures:
But this is going to be an experiment alone, not just a way to fund other experiments. Perlstein aims to statistically review the amounts getting donated, what kind of publicity translates into the most donations, and considerably additional alongside the way. And if you add money, you get to take part in the science being completed, not just observe it materialize.
This is a actually interesting job, and not just for pharmacology. It really is a daring new experiment in how science receives funded and a way to see if interested men and women will truly band jointly to guidance exploration somewhat than relying on more traditional funding mechanisms. Go be a part of this bold check!
Prime impression:SubDural12/Wikimedia Commons/General public Domain